rolex 5513 vs 1680 | military rolex submariner 5513 rolex 5513 vs 1680 I have both a 5513 matt dial and 1680 white with T19 super dome instead of top hat. I adore them both, and both cost me around $7K (£4.5K UK) from dealers. Both have excellent matching patina and good provenance but no original papers. $9,875.00
0 · rolex submariner 5513 price
1 · rolex submariner 5513 best years
2 · rolex 5513 meters before feet
3 · rolex 5513 gilt gloss dial
4 · rolex 5513 gilt dial
5 · rolex 5513 gilt
6 · rolex 5513 dial variations
7 · military rolex submariner 5513
The Rolex Submariner reference 16610 (along with the reference 16800) is the bridge between two eras of Rolex. Introduced in 1987, it's part vintage, part modern. One of the Crown's first "five-digit" .
rolex submariner 5513 price
I have both a 5513 matt dial and 1680 white with T19 super dome instead of top hat. I adore them both, and both cost me around K (£4.5K UK) from dealers. Both have excellent matching patina and good provenance but no original papers.
1680 has a 26.5mm dial, so the 26mm dial of the 5513 might 'fall through' the dial seat? May. 5513 and 1680 are two very different watches, both are excellent though and . 1680 has a 26.5mm dial, so the 26mm dial of the 5513 might 'fall through' the .
terra bella dior
rolex submariner 5513 best years
I have both a 5513 matt dial and 1680 white with T19 super dome instead of top hat. I adore them both, and both cost me around K (£4.5K UK) from dealers. Both have excellent matching patina and good provenance but no original papers.
5513 and 1680 are two very different watches, both are excellent though and probably the best way into vintage imo. Buy the best you can and stretch your budget as you will live with the watch for hopefully eons and any extra spent will soon be forgotten. 1680 has a 26.5mm dial, so the 26mm dial of the 5513 might 'fall through' the dial seat? Maybe the 1570 movement is touch thicker than the 1520, due to the date wheel, so the movement sits in a slightly different position compared to the crown, but I . I’ve decided on a 1680 or a 5513 as my first and likely only vintage Rolex. The date vs no date feature makes no difference to me. I would be looking for white dial on the 5513.Ref. 5513 – 1962 – 1989. The Ref. 5513 came to market in 1962, around three years after the Ref. 5512. In a nutshell, the two watches are exactly the same, except one got a chronometer movement and the other didn’t. Of course, this being Rolex, things are a .
The only real difference between that pair lay in the movement driving them. The ref. 5512 was the (usually) COSC–rated variant, while its partner only ever received non-chronometer calibers. The ref. 5513 was therefore the cheaper option and the one with fewer lines of text on the dial.
The smallest differences can separate a relatively common ,000 watch from a rare ,000 watch, and learning about them is a never-ending journey. It's part of what makes vintage Rolex so much fun to collect.While the Submariner 5512 and 5513 are no-date versions of the famous Rolex diving watch, the Submariner ref. 1680 is the date version. In fact, with its introduction in 1969, the ref. 1680 was the first Submariner that came with a date window.Rolex 1680 Price. Red Submariner watches often command a higher premium on the secondary market than their counterparts with a white logo, averaging between k and k as of 2022. On the other hand, the Rolex 1680 white Submariner will cost you between k and k.
So the overwhelming majority are of the opinion that the 5513 is a better model to own (though perhaps not this one, since as someone pointed out, it looks over-polished and the lugs aren't as sharp) and the ideal thing would be to wait for a . I have both a 5513 matt dial and 1680 white with T19 super dome instead of top hat. I adore them both, and both cost me around K (£4.5K UK) from dealers. Both have excellent matching patina and good provenance but no original papers. 5513 and 1680 are two very different watches, both are excellent though and probably the best way into vintage imo. Buy the best you can and stretch your budget as you will live with the watch for hopefully eons and any extra spent will soon be forgotten.
sport homme dior
1680 has a 26.5mm dial, so the 26mm dial of the 5513 might 'fall through' the dial seat? Maybe the 1570 movement is touch thicker than the 1520, due to the date wheel, so the movement sits in a slightly different position compared to the crown, but I .
I’ve decided on a 1680 or a 5513 as my first and likely only vintage Rolex. The date vs no date feature makes no difference to me. I would be looking for white dial on the 5513.
Ref. 5513 – 1962 – 1989. The Ref. 5513 came to market in 1962, around three years after the Ref. 5512. In a nutshell, the two watches are exactly the same, except one got a chronometer movement and the other didn’t. Of course, this being Rolex, things are a .
The only real difference between that pair lay in the movement driving them. The ref. 5512 was the (usually) COSC–rated variant, while its partner only ever received non-chronometer calibers. The ref. 5513 was therefore the cheaper option and the one with fewer lines of text on the dial. The smallest differences can separate a relatively common ,000 watch from a rare ,000 watch, and learning about them is a never-ending journey. It's part of what makes vintage Rolex so much fun to collect.While the Submariner 5512 and 5513 are no-date versions of the famous Rolex diving watch, the Submariner ref. 1680 is the date version. In fact, with its introduction in 1969, the ref. 1680 was the first Submariner that came with a date window.Rolex 1680 Price. Red Submariner watches often command a higher premium on the secondary market than their counterparts with a white logo, averaging between k and k as of 2022. On the other hand, the Rolex 1680 white Submariner will cost you between k and k.
rolex 5513 meters before feet
$7,812.00
rolex 5513 vs 1680|military rolex submariner 5513
